¹Ditya Rismawan,²Hieronymus Purwanta,³Susanto

^1,2,3History Education Postgraduate Program, Sebelas Maret University, Jl. Ir. Sutami No 36, Surakarta, 5712

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i3-57

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The construction of an understanding of Sukarno is strongly influenced by how the discourse about Sukarno is produced. Discourse about Sukarno can only be traced through texts documenting the narrative about Sukarno. This study aims to describe how Sukarno is contained in the text. This research uses Qualitative research methods with a Critical Discourse Analysis approach. Critical Discourse Analysis uses Norman Fairclough's model with a model framework, namely, Text analysis, Discourse practice, and Sociocultural practice. The results of this study showed that: (1) texts about Sukarno in the Indonesian history textbook chapter of Guided Democracy in the 1975 curriculum were studied in the early stages, namely text analysis by looking at the relationship between words; (2) The text data that has been obtained is then analyzed using the second stage, namely Discourse practice, which is a stage to see how the production and consumption of the text; (3) The last stage in Norman Fairclough's Critical Discourse Analysis model is Sociocultural practice, which is a stage where it looks at external influences in influencing a discourse.

KEYWORDS:

Sukarno, Textbook, Critical Discourse Analysis, Guided Democracy, Curiculum 1975.

REFERENCES

1) Budiono, H., & Awaludin, A. F. (2017). Perkembangan Historiografi Buku Teks Sejarah Di Indonesia Masa Orde Baru Hingga Reformasi. 1(1), 36–43.

2) Eriyanto. (2001). Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKIS.

3) Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Sosial Change. Cambrige: Polity Press.

4) Fairclough, N. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Analysis of Language. In Language (Vol. 73). New York: Longman Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2307/416612

5) Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and Power (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

6) Joeniarto. (1990). Sejarah Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

7) Marlina. (2016). Pengaruh Zeitgeist Terhadap Muatan Sejarah di Buku Teks Pelajaran Sejarah SMA Kurikulum 1975- 2004. Indonesian Journal of History Education, 4(1), 33–40. Retrieved from http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ijhe

8) McCullagh, C. B. (1998). The Truth of History. London: Routledge.

9) Moleong, L. (2013). Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

10) Notosusanto, N., Basri, Y., Lapian, A. B., Sumadio, B., Bintarti, D. D., Djokosuryo., … Djamhari, S. A. (1986). Sejarah Nasional Indonesia Jilid 3 Untuk SMA Kurikulum 1975 (3rd ed.; N. Notosusanto & Y. Basri, Eds.). Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

11) Purwanta, Hiernonymus, Santos, H. H., & Haryono, A. (2015). Wacana Identitas Nasional Pada Buku Teks Pelajaran Sejarah Di Inggris Dan Indonesia: Kajian Komparatif. Patrawidya, 16(3), 345–362.

12) Purwanta, Hieronymus. (2013). Militer Dan Konstruksi Identitas Nasional: Analisis Buku Teks Pelajaran Sejarah Sma Masa Orde Baru. Paramita, 13(1), 88–102.

13) Safitri, R., & Purwaningsih, S. (2016). Kurikulum Nasional Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Masa Orde Baru Tahun 1968- 1998. AVATARA, e-Journal Pendidikan Sejarah, 4(3), 644.

14) Sjamsuddin, H. (1998). Penulisan Buku Teks Sejarah: Kriteria dan Permasalahan (P. S. F. UPI, Ed.). Bandung.

15) Sudibyo, A. (1998). De-Soekarnoisasi Dalam Wacana Resmi Orde Baru: KiIas-BaIik Praktek-Praktek Rekayasa Kebenaran dan Wacana Sejarah Oleh Rejim Orde Baru. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 2(1), 1–25.

16) Sugiyono. (2014). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

17) Syahbuddin. (2017). Upaya Soeharto Memotong Pilar-Pilar Kekuasaan Soekarno. Jurnal Pendidikan IPS, 7(1), 1–11.

18) Wanardi, S. (2014). Menyibak Tabir Orde Baru, memoar politik Indonesia 1965-1998. Jakarta: Kompas.

19) White, H. (2008). The historical event. Differences, 19(2), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2008-002

20) Wodak, R. (2011). Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse-Historical Approach. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, (August), 63–94. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.d6

21) Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods Of Critical Discourse Analysis (7th ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Retrieved from https://project.wnyc.org/

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 03 MARCH 2023